Pak. J. Bot., 45(1): 127-134, 2013. |
Back to Contents | ||||
|
Updated: 24-02-13 | ||||
|
OPTIMIZATION OF SOIL K: NA RATIO FOR COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.) NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS
LIAQAT ALI1, MUHAMMAD ASHRAF2, MUHAMMAD MAQBOOL3, RASHID AHMAD4 AND AHSAN AZIZ2
Abstract: Adequate potassium (K) supply is crucial for cotton growth and development. However, sodium (Na) can share some functions with K. In present study, we investigated the effects of replacing K with Na at different ratios on growth, ionic relations and yield as well as yield attributes of two cotton varieties differed in K use efficiency. Different levels of K and Na giving K: Na ratios of 3.5: 1 (control), 3.75: 1, 4: 1, 4.25: 1, 4.5: 1, 2.8: 1, 3: 1, 3.2: 1, 3.4: 1, 3.6: 1 were arranged in triplicates according to randomized complete block design under natural field conditions. Results revealed that maximum seed cotton yield was obtained at K: Na ratio of 3.4: 1 followed by 3.6: 1 in both cotton varieties. However, NIBGE-2 manifested greater seed cotton yield than MNH-786. The significant (p≤0.05) positive correlation was found between number of bolls plant-1 and seed cotton yield (R2 = 0.62 for NIBGE-2 and R2 = 0.64 for MNH-786) determined at different levels of K and Na. Leaf K: Na ratio also varied significantly (p≤0.05) due to main effects of K, Na, varieties and their interactions. Maximum leaf K: Na ratio was shown by NIBGE-2 with 270 kg K ha-1+60 kg Na ha-1 at ratio of 4.5: 1 followed by 255 kg K ha-1+60 kg Na ha-1 at ratio of 4.25: 1. Although fiber quality of both cotton varieties were markedly influenced by different ratios of K: Na, however these differences between treatments and varieties were not consistent. There was a significant positive correlation between K concentration and fiber length (R2 = 0.97 for NIBGE-2 and R2 = 0.98 for MNH-786). Our results suggested that cotton growth and yield could be improved by adding appropriate amounts of K and Na.
1Adaptive Research Farm, Department of Agriculture, Vehari, Pakistan 2University College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan. 3University College of Agriculture, Bahauddin Zakria University, Multan, Pakistan 4Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan *Corresponding author: mashraf_pk94@hotmail.com |
||||
|
|||||
Back to Contents |
|
Back to Contents | |||
|