Back to Contents

Pak. J. Bot., 46(1): 65-80, 2014.

FREE FULL TEXT PDF

STRUCTURE, COMPOSITION AND DIVERSITY OF THE VEGETATION OF HUB DAM CATCHMENT AREA, PAKISTAN

SYED SHAHID SHAUKAT¹, MOAZZAM ALI KHAN¹, MICHAEL METT² AND MUHAMMAD FAHEEM SIDDIQUI ³

Abstract: A study of vegetation structure, composition and diversity of Hub-dam catchment area was conducted. A total of 106 species were recorded of which 57 were annuals while 49 were perennials. The vegetation was dominated by small trees and shrubs. Spatial patterns within-community of plant populations using variance/mean ratio and Morisita’s index was also investigated. Of the 14 perennial species investigated seven (Barleria acanthoides, Grewia tenax, Indigofera oblongifolia, Aerva persica, Rhazya stricta, Iphiona grantioides and Cymbopogon jwarancusa) predominately exhibited aggregated pattern. Four species (Acacia senegal, Prosopis juliflora, Salvadora oleoides and Calotropis procera) usually exhibited random distribution but infrequently aggregated pattern. Three species (Senna holosericea, Zizyphus nummularia and Vernonia cinerescens) showed aggregated pattern or random distribution more or less equally often.

The distribution pattern of vegetation composition and the underlying environmental gradients, correspondence analysis (CA) ordination and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) were employed. Group structure inherent in the vegetation was disclosed using Ward’s agglomerative cluster analysis. Species diversity was measured and diversity was averaged for each group. Diversity of group I (Acacia senegal and Prosopis juliflora community type) was highest because this community included a number of mid-succession species, while diversity was lowest for group 4 (Prosopis juliflora and Capparis decidua community type) as this community was highly disturbed. In the climax community (group 3), the diversity level slightly decreased, suggesting the monopolization of resources by this community. Four major community types were recognized by Ward’s cluster analysis, each of which was associated with particular topographic-edaphic factors, while one was mainly governed by anthropogenic disturbance. Biological spectrum constructed for the flora showed dominance of therophytes and chamaephytes.

¹Institute of Environmental Studies, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan

²Unit of Hydraulic Engineering (IWI), University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 13, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria

³Department of Botany, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan