<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article>
  <article-id pub-id-type="internal">12983</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30848/PJB2025-2(39)</article-id>
  <article-title>&lt;p&gt;
	Organic weed management can improve rice-maize rotation performances under conservation agriculture&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</article-title>
  <contrib-group><contrib><name><string>Subhra Sahoo, Dhirendra Kumar Roy, Shivani Ranjan, Sumit Sow, Smruti Ranjan Padhan, Alaa Baazeem, Ömer Konuşkan, Zeki Erden, Çağdaş Can Toprak and Ayman El Sabagh</string></name></contrib></contrib-group>
  <abstract>&lt;p class=&quot;MDPI16affiliation&quot; style=&quot;margin: 0in 0.25in 0.0001pt; text-indent: 0.25in; line-height: normal; text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;
	&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-US&quot; new=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;A two-year field experiment was carried out to ascertain the influence of organic weed management (OWM) on the crop performance and productivity of rice&amp;ndash;maize rotation under conservation agriculture. The experiment comprised of four tillage practices as main plots and five OWM treatments as subplots arranged in split-plot design with three replication. The tillage management treatments included ZTR &lt;i&gt;fb&lt;/i&gt; ZTM: zero-tillage (ZT) direct seeded rice (DSR) followed by (fb) ZT-maize, PBDSR+R &lt;i&gt;fb&lt;/i&gt; PBDSM+R: DSR fb maize both in permanent bed (PB) with residue incorporation, PBDSR-R &lt;i&gt;fb&lt;/i&gt; PBDSM-R: DSR &lt;i&gt;fb&lt;/i&gt; maize both in PB without residue and CTR &lt;i&gt;fb&lt;/i&gt; CTM: conventionally tilled rice &lt;i&gt;fb&lt;/i&gt; maize. In OWM, five treatments were as follows: UC: unweeded weed control, VM: vermicompost mulching, PVM: phosphorous (P) enriched VM, LM: live-mulch of &lt;i&gt;Sesbania&lt;/i&gt; spp. in rice and &lt;i&gt;Pisum sativum&lt;/i&gt; in maize, WF: weed-free check. The PBDSR+R &lt;i&gt;fb&lt;/i&gt; PBDSM+R obtained a significantly higher plant height (18.9&amp;ndash;19.7%), leaf area index (LAI) (24.0&amp;ndash;24.6%), dry matter accumulation (DMA) (10.8&amp;ndash;11.3%) and crop growth rate (CGR) over CTR &lt;i&gt;fb&lt;/i&gt; CTM in both rice and maize in all the growth stages. Moreover, PBDSR+R &lt;i&gt;fb&lt;/i&gt; PBDSM+R recorded significantly higher grain yield (63.6 and 66.0 q ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) in rice and in maize (93.02 and 94.31 q ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) over other treatments in both years. Among the various OWM, LM reported significantly superior growth attributes &lt;i&gt;viz.&lt;/i&gt; plant height, number of tillers m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt;, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation in rice and maize and grain yield by 12.3&amp;ndash;16% in rice and 7.4&amp;ndash;8.5% in maize over VM across the years of study. The PBDSR+R &lt;i&gt;fb&lt;/i&gt; PBDSM+R recorded and LM recorded significantly the highest net return and benefit-cost ratio throughout the study. The study highlights that residue incorporation under rice&amp;ndash;maize rotation in PB led CA system along with LM enhanced productivity and profitability.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
  <publication-status>Published</publication-status>
  <year>2025</year>
  <volume>57</volume>
  <issue>2</issue>
  <pages-from>755</pages-from>
  <pages-to>770</pages-to>
</article>
